Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir.livejournal.com
No, they're way too young.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jehanna.livejournal.com
Yes, Undergrads Are Too Young. Most of them. At least wait till they're able to drink legally before you swoop in on your targets. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bratling.livejournal.com
nah, not really. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir.livejournal.com
Going to change your name to 'cos' next ?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lizzielizzie.livejournal.com
Yes, undergrads at Too Young. Pick up some hot graduate student instead. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] z-gryphon.livejournal.com
... for Social Security.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] agthorr.livejournal.com
Nah! Hell, I'm dating one!

-- Agthorr
(though, she's older than me...)

They're not too young until I say they are...

Date: 2003-09-08 02:26 pm (UTC)
bluegargantua: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bluegargantua


...and they're too damn young.

This year's freshmen were *6 YEARS OLD* when I was a freshman.

Too young
Tom

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:26 pm (UTC)
kiya: (snakie)
From: [personal profile] kiya
Because otherwise they wouldn't be able to fully appreciate your taste in booze. ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bratling.livejournal.com
nah, just got my mid-life crisis out of the way a couple weeks ago...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pir.livejournal.com
Was she cute ?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] donnerjack.livejournal.com
Don't think of it as young, think of it as "fresh". ;)
From: [identity profile] mikecap.livejournal.com
Hee.

I think my new standard is "must be two digits old, where first digit is 2"...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] awfief.livejournal.com
but I'm not! :)

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bratling.livejournal.com
very.

and a few days later, she went off to college...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 02:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eccles.livejournal.com
Oh for shame on you.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:19 pm (UTC)
reddragdiva: (Default)
From: [personal profile] reddragdiva
Be sure to check their ID.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zonereyrie.livejournal.com
What, most of them are at *least* 16, right?

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_nicolai_/
Just pick a sensible country ;)

They're still too young. Decorative, mind...

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zonereyrie.livejournal.com
Yeah, well, they were probably *3* when I was a frosh.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solipsistnation.livejournal.com

You are a stirring example, my friend. I thank you for your support in this time of need.

/me -> FRESHMAN

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solipsistnation.livejournal.com
So freshman women are way, WAY too young?
From: [identity profile] solipsistnation.livejournal.com

Aw, man. And here I was hoping for moral support. Shoot.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] solipsistnation.livejournal.com

Indeed you aren't, thankfully.

I may have some, um, tension to work off soon.

(no subject)

Date: 2003-09-08 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] londo.livejournal.com
Oh yeah? Well, when I was a freshman, they were, like... 15.

Wait, crap. Wrong direction.

They're still too young for me... though not nearly by the same margin.
Page 1 of 3 << [1] [2] [3] >>